Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case of kidnapping for marriage and subsequent escape, alleging confinement. The Court rejected the prayer, declining to grant bail.
Prayer for anticipation bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37001 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2018 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR
====================================================== Prem Kumar Chaudhary S/o Santosh Kumar Chaudhary, R/o Vill.- Barhara, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
2 03-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Bihar P.S. Case No.87 of 2015 instituted for the offences under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per First Information Report allegation has been made that a minor girl has been kidnapped for the purposes of marriage and in the statement made under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure victim has stated that she was kidnapped by the present petitioner, kept confined in a room for two days and when she found that no one was there she escaped and reached to the women police station. Women police station informed the family members who came there.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37001 of 2018 (2) dt.03-07-2018
2 /2
In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Vinay/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed to grant anticipatory bail in a case involving kidnapping for marriage under Section 366(A) IPC?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prem Kumar Chaudhary
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
