Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Pinki Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

Home
Patna HC
2018
Pinki Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of BiharPinki Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Allowed

Pinki Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jul 2018CR. MISC./36983/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

ISSUED_MJ

What did the court decide?

ISSUED_MJ

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36983 of 2018

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2017 Thana- SHAKURABAD District- Jehanabad

======================================================

1. Pinki Devi, Wife of Pappu Mishra @ Pappu Kumar

Pappu Mishra @ Pappu Kumar, Son of Jagdeo Mishra Both are resident of Village- Malaypur, P.S. Malaypur, District- Jamui.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Prasad Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav, APP ======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in the summons case facts.

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Criminal ProcedureSection 438(2)

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Pinki Devi
petitioner
Pappu Mishra @ Pappu Kumar
respondent
The State of Bihar

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Patna HC
Decided on: 2 Jul 2018 · July
Registered: 25 Jun 2018
Case no.: CR. MISC./36983/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Shivaji Pandey

Sandeep Kumar Jha @ Sandeep Kumar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.
29 Jun 2018
Pankaj Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar
29 Jun 2018
Md. Jafar Rakib @ Md. Zafar Rakib Vs The State Of Bihar
29 Jun 2018
Amarendra Singh @ Amarend Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar
2 Jul 2018

Cite this judgement

Pinki Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar, CR. MISC./36983/2018 (PAT), decided on 2 July 2018.

The Patna High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Criminal ProcedureSection 438(2)

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

Shivaji Pandey

Parties & counsel

Outcome

ISSUED_MJ

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in the summons case facts.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

ISSUED_MJ

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

2 02-07-2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No.88 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation has been made that the victim has been killed by administering the poison by inmates.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the victim has died on account of snack-bitting. He further submits that the petitioner no.1 is the sister-in-law of the victim and petitioner no.2 is the husband of petitioner no.1.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36983 of 2018(2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Pinki Devi and Pappu Mishra @ Pappu Kumar, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case no.88 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that whenever the police will call the petitioners for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, they will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

pawan/-

U T

Shivaji Pandey

CNR

BRHC010221522018

Topic

Cheating and Forgery

Bench

Disposal

BAIL GRANTED

Manilal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

2 Jul 2018

Shambhu Nath Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

2 Jul 2018