Remanded

Smt. Rina Devi @ Rina Kumari Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2018CR. MISC./36216/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this oral order, the High Court of Patna set aside the Additional Sessions Judge's February 7, 2018 order rejecting the petitioner's pre-arrest bail. The court remitted the matter to allow the anticipatory bail petition to be rehearing after the case diary was summoned.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 07.04.2018 set aside; matter remitted to Sessions Court to rehear anticipatory bail petition after summoning case diary.

Smt. Rina Devi @ Rina Kumari Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36216 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -440 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWALI District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== Smt. Rina Devi @ Rina Kumari Gupta, wife of Sri Jitendra Kumar Gupat @ Deepak Kumar, resident of village- Bhaktopur Police Station- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶6

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.440 of 2017 registered under Sections 417, 418, 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

It appears that though the court below had summoned the case diary, learned counsel for the petitioner insisted that his case may be disposed of in absence of the case diary on the basis of materials available on record. It is unfortunate that such prayer was allowed by the court below and his application for grant of pre-arrest bail has been rejected. In the opinion of this Court if the court felt necessity for summoning case diary, merely because

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36216 of 2018 (2) dt.04-07-2018

¶9

2/2

¶10

counsel insisted for disposal of the case, the court ought not to have disposed of the matter.

¶11

Accordingly, I set aside the order dated 07.04.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, C.B.I.-II, Patna and remit the matter back to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, C.B.I., Patna to rehear the anticipatory bail petition no.298 of 2018 after summoning the case diary and pass appropriate order on merit in accordance with law.

¶12

Registry shall communicate the order to the court below

¶13

forthwith.

¶14

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶15

Md.S./-

¶16

U T

Smt. Rina Devi @ Rina Kumari Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rina Devi @ Rina Kumari Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Saw Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudarshan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vidya Yadav @ Vidya Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Chhotu @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Prasad @ Devendra Kumar Rai @ Devendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar