Parmatma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail petitioner detained since May 2, 2017, in an NDPS case involving 4 kg of ganja. Court rejected the fresh bail prayer due to prior rejections and pending examination of the Investigating Officer, but directed the trial court to conclude the trial within three months and produced I.O. on the first date without fail.
What did the court decide?
Broad liberty to renew bail prayer if trial not concluded within three months; Trial Court to finish within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35644 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2017 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran
======================================================
Parmatma Yadav, Son of Late Hira Yadav, Resident of Village- Vashishth Nagar Plot, P.S.- Revti, District- Balia (U.P.).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
ORAL ORDER
5 26-09-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail may be granted when the only witness left is the Investigating Officer who has not yet been examined and the trial is delayed.
Whether the delay in concluding the trial after two bail rejections warrants enlargement on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parmatma Yadav
- respondent
State of Bihar
Coram
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court