due to dispute relating to partition, the opposite party no. 2 has been filing regular complaints before the police and the authorities to harass and force the petitioners to accept her wishes. It was submitted that despite the husband and son of the opposite party no. 2 being alive, it is opposite party no. 2, who is coming in the forefront and lodging false complaints before the authorities. He further submitted that the opposite party no. 2 had filed Sarmera P.S. Case No. 68 of 2005, in which the police had submitted final form finding the case to be false and the learned C.J.M., Nalanda had also accepted the same. It was submitted that similarly in another complaint case, the Court under Section 203 of the Code had dismissed the same. Learned counsel submitted that the parties have also come to a formal agreement before the Punches on 11.09.2006 with regard to not filing cases against each other and also with regard to settlement of the land dispute. Learned counsel submitted that the complaint case has been filed in a routine and mechanical manner without complying with the provisions of Section 154 of the Code, especially Sub-section (3) thereof, which requires a person to first send the substance of such information, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned who, if satisfied that such information discloses commission of cognizable offence, shall either investigate the case himself or
