Chandan Kumar Ray v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Patna High Court denied anticipatory bail to Chandan Kumar Ray in a case involving allegations under sections 376, 511, and 498A IPC. The court held the matter was not fit for anticipatory bail despite the petitioner's offer to settle.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31523 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2322 Year-2014 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar
======================================================
Chandan Kumar Ray Son of Ram Nagina Ray Resident of Mohalla Driver tola Sangram Chouk , Railway Quarter , P.S. Town, District Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar.
- Anju Devi Daughter of Suresh Mahto, Wife of Chandan Kumar Ray Resident of Village Nital Bastin ward No. 6, P.S. Thakurganj, District Katihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Atul Chandra ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case under sections 376, 511, 498A, and 406 of the IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chandan Kumar Ray
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Anju Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court