Allowed

Vidya Yadav @ Vidyanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Aug 2018CR. MISC./31324/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner in custody sought regular bail for offences under IPC Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307. Having been absconder since 2006 bail cancellation, he was apprehended in 2017. Court granted bail upon furnishing bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge IVth, Gaya.

Vidya Yadav @ Vidyanand Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31324 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-1994 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vidya Yadav @ Vidyanand Yadav, S/o Late Dev Lali Yadav, resident of Village- Kohbara, P.O.- Hathiyama, P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Murlidhar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 125 of 1994 (Tr. No. 603A of 2017) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 and 307 of Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Petitioner was granted regular bail in this case in 2006 itself, but his bail bond was cancelled because of his nonappearance on 13.02.2006. Thereafter petitioner was declared absconder and process were issued under Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. Petitioner was apprehended by police on 17.12.2017 and since then he is in custody.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he will not misuse the privilege of bail any further and he

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31324 of 2018(5) dt.13-08-2018 2/2

¶16

remained in custody for more than eight months as such he may be granted regular bail.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge IVth, Gaya, in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 125 of 1994 (Tr. No. 603A of 2017).

¶18

Petitioner shall remain present on each and every date and non-appearance on two consecutive dates without any valid reasons, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶19

(S. Kumar, J.)

¶20

Rajiv/manoj

¶21

U T

Vidya Yadav @ Vidyanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidya Yadav @ Vidyanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnupad Das @ Vishnupat Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramanand Mandal @ Raniya Vs The State Of Bihar

Kishori Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Ehsanullah Vs The State Of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar