Allowed

Nilam Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC24 May 2018CR. MISC./30803/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a complaint case alleging criminal conspiracy and forgery. The court observed the dispute involved a partner relationship and internal share dispute. The prayer for anticipatory bail was allowed with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to surrender within six weeks to be released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Nilam Kumar Agrawal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30803 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2018 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nilam Kumar Agrawal S/o Sri Bishwanath Agrawal, Resident of Village/ Mohalla- Shivajee Colony, Purnia, P.S.- K.Hat, District- Purnia.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Arun Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Mohan Lal Agrawal, Resident of Bhatt Bazar, Durgabari, P.S. K.Hat, District- Purnia.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kanhaiya Kishore ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 24-05-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint case no. 190/2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant himself was one of the partner of the aforesaid Cold Storage which is apparent from para 2 of the complaint petition. From the narration of allegation made in the complaint petition, it appears that the there is dispute between the partners with regard to their share. It is further submitted that earlier petitioner has also filed a case against the complainant and two

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30803 of 2018(2) dt.24-05-2018 2/3

¶17

other partners, namely Subodh Kumar Kedia and Jagat Lal Baishyantri on 16.10.2017 alleging that complainant misappropriated the amount of Rs. fifteen lacs which was transferred in the account of Shri Ram Furniture proprietor Arun Kumar Agrawal. The aforesaid complaint has been annexed as Annexure-3 to the bail petition. As such it appears that there is dispute between both partners for share for which appropriate remedy is available.

¶18

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with C.A. No. 190 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Purnia, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30803 of 2018(2) dt.24-05-2018 3/3

¶20

petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶21

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶22

shyambihari/-

¶23

U T

Nilam Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilam Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Phantoosh Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitish Kumar @ Golu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Siyaram Tanti @ Siyaram Khatve and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Zirwa Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nitish Choudhary and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ghanshyam Pandit Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.