Allowed

Mithlesh Singh @ Mithu Singh @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2018CR. MISC./30505/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of rape andAttempted Rape under IPC along with an offence under POCSO Act. Bail was released on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Mithlesh Singh @ Mithu Singh @ Mithilesh Singh… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30505 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2018 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== Mithlesh Singh @ Mitthu Singh @ Mithilesh Singh S/o Rajkumar Singh @ Negru Singh, R/o Vill.- Dumariya, Chauhan Tola, P.S.- Narpatganj, Distt.Araria.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Mandal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Panchanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

3 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No.127 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

¶9

As per written report, the informant has alleged that while her daughter aged about 9 years was coming from school to home was pulled in maize field where the petitioner tried to commit rape on her.

¶10

It has been submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and frivolous. The petitioner and the informant are co-villagers and next neighbours having good relation but due

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30505 of 2018 (3) dt.04-07-2018

¶12

¶13

to misconception this case has been lodged against the petitioner. He is in custody since 07.03.2018 having clean antecedent and so he deserves bail.

¶14

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Araria in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No.127 of 2018.

¶16

(Sanjay Kumar, J)

¶17

Harish/-

¶18

Mithlesh Singh @ Mithu Singh @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithlesh Singh @ Mithu Singh @ Mithilesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Barud Pandit @ Barood Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalbabu Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithilesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijai Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Uraon Vs The State Of Bihar

Military @ Miletry @ Nirmal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar