Allowed

Sanjit @ Sanjit Kumar @ Jaunty v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 May 2018CR. MISC./28630/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a case concerning arson and mischief under Sects. 436, 427, and 34 IPC. Bail is granted after three months of custody, requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, one being a close relative with immovable property.

What did the court decide?

Enlarged on bail on completion of three months in custody on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sanjit @ Sanjit Kumar @ Jaunty Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28630 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -775 Year- 2017 Thana -PHULWARI District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== Sanjit @ Sanjit Kumar @ Jaunty S/o Uday Ray, R/o Vill.- Isopur, P.S.Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwa Bijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 11-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶7

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulwari Sarif P.S. Case No. 775 of 2017 for offences punishable under Sections 436, 427, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The First Information Report, as lodged by the lady owner of the house who had alleged that her house has been burnt by some miscreants and the goods and articles of the tenant as well as of herself got burnt.

¶9

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the F.I.R. and as he was arrested in Phulwari Sarif P.S. Case No. 777 of 2017

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28630 of 2018 (2) dt.11-05-2018

¶11

2/2

¶12

thereafter he has been made accused in many cases and remanded in the present case. He submits that nothing has been recovered from his possession and he is languishing in judicial custody since 05.03.2018.

¶13

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that he is involved in five more cases of similar nature.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on completion of three months in custody on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Sub-Judge- XV, Patna in connection with Phulwari Sarif P.S. Case No.775 of 2017 subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶15

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶16

Devendra/-

¶17

U T

Sanjit @ Sanjit Kumar @ Jaunty v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjit @ Sanjit Kumar @ Jaunty v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nityanand Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sk. Matlub @ Sk. Matloob @ Md. Matlub and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Satrughan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Laddan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shubham Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar