An application for anticipatory bail filed by Durgesh Singh in connection with Section 392 IPC case at Matihani was dismissed. The petitioner was to surrender for regular bail consideration.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed; directed to surrender for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28282 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2013 Thana -MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Singh(App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 17-05-2018
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 101 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation as per F.I.R that mobile and other articles of the informant was snatched and this petitioner was using the Sim of the said mobile and it also appears that he is an accused in four other cases.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and there is no recovery from his possession. Further submission is that though he is accused in four other cases but in all those cases, he has already been acquitted
Heard learned APP also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28282 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018
2/2
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. This application is, accordingly, dismissed.
However, the petitioner, if so desire may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below shall dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
sunil/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with PS Case No. 101 of 2013 involving offences under Section 392 IPC.
Durgesh Singh
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
