Allowed

Mithoo @ Hasnain v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2018CR. MISC./27710/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous application, the Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's petition to quash the First Information Report and the order of cognizance under Sections 363, 366A, and 34 of the IPC, noting the victim's voluntary marriage to another person and lack of overt acts against the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order of cognizance dated 7.7.2015 and entire criminal proceedings against the petitioner in Araria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015 are quashed.

Mithoo @ Hasnain Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27710 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2015 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA

¶4

=========================================================== Mithoo @ Hasnain, Son of Md. Siddik, resident of village - Bangama, P.S. + District - Araria.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindeshwar Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, A.P.P. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-02-2018

¶7

1. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed for quashing the First Information Report of Araria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015 dated 26.1.2015, G.R. No. 237 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶9

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially petition was filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the First Information Report of Araria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015 but police during pendency of the petition, submitted charge sheet against the petitioner and other accused persons as named in the charge sheet

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27710 of 2015 dt.19-02-2018

¶11

2/3

¶12

for the offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code which has been enclosed as Annexure-4 of the Interlocutory application No. 2639 of 2017. The court below has taken cognizance on the basis of charge sheet submitted against the petitioner and other accused persons for the offence under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code by order dated 7.7.2015 passed in Araria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015.

¶13

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during pendency of the case in the court below, the victim girl has appeared and given her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. wherein she has stated that she has voluntarily married with Guddu @ Gufran @ Gufran Alam and she is living with him as wife and husband in Delhi. She has 9 months old son from the said marriage. It has further been submitted that the victim girl has mentioned in paragraph-8 of the main petition that after performing marriage with Guddu @ Gufran @ Gufran Alam, the victim girl and Guddu @ Gufran felt fear and they both moved the Hon’ble Delhi High Court and filed a Cr. Writ petition bearing WP (CRL) 705 of 2015 and the Hon’ble Delhi High Court directed to SHO Police Station, Jaitpur, New Delhi, to ensure Police protection to the petitioner after assessing the threat perception. The victim girl and Guddu @ Gufran @ Gufran Alam have stated in the aforesaid petition that they are

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27710 of 2015 dt.19-02-2018

¶15

3/3

¶16

adults and have voluntarily performed marriage out of their own sweet will, but the family members opposed the marriage between them and have threatened the couple with dire consequences. Moreover, there is no allegation of any overt act against this petitioner in the statement of victim girl recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C.

¶17

5. There is general and omnibus allegation in the written report that this petitioner along with Guddu @ Gufran @ Gufran Alam and other persons have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

¶18

6. Therefore, the impugned order of cognizance dated 7.7.2015 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in Araria P.S. Case No. 37 of 2015 along with the entire Criminal Proceedings against the petitioner is hereby quashed.

¶19

7. This Criminal Miscellaneous application is accordingly allowed.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

S.Ali/-

¶22

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	28/02/2018
Transmission Date	28/02/2018

Mithoo @ Hasnain v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithoo @ Hasnain v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Das Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Chandra Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manoj Razak @ Manoj Kumar Razak Vs The Inspector General Of Police Vigilance Investigation Of Bureau and Anr.

Eklavya @ Bablu Paswan and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.