Allowed

Bilendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 May 2018CR. MISC./27559/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court enlarged the petitioner on bail in an arms case after examining custody duration, nature of recovery, and conditions of prior bail for a co-accused. The court directed the execution of a bond with sureties and a relative holding immovable property.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each; one bailor to be a close relative with sufficient immovable property.

Bilendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27559 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -255 Year- 2017 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD

¶3

====================================================== Bilendra Yadav S/o Kamaldeo Yadav, R/o Vill.- Repura, P.S.- Kako (Bhelawar O.P.), in the District of Jehanabad.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navin Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 09-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.12.2017 in connection with Kako (Bhelawar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 255 of 2017 for offences punishable under Sections 25 (1B)a/26/34 of the Arms Act.

¶7

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on information that one dreaded criminal Gehwan Yadav is hiding in the house of one Yogendra Yadav, the house of the said co-accused Yogendra Yadav was searched and

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27559 of 2018 (2) dt.09-05-2018

¶9

2/3

¶10

from the house a rifle was recovered. The petitioner as well as Yogendra Yadav were made accused in the present case.

¶11

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶12

petitioner that he is innocent, recovery is not from his conscious possession and that Yogendra Yadav has already been granted the privilege of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 23337 of 2018 vide order dated 24.04.2018. It is submitted that the house belonged to all family members, no overt act has been alleged to have been committed by the petitioner and no cartridge has been recovered.

¶13

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer

¶14

for bail.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-IV-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Kako (Bhelawar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 255 of 2017, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27559 of 2018 (2) dt.09-05-2018

¶17

3/3

¶18

property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the

¶19

petitioner.

¶20

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶21

Devendra/-

¶22

U T

Bilendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bilendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Aman Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Pasi Vs The State Of Bihar