In a bail application arising out of murder and related offences, the High Court of Patna admitted the petitioner on bail by fixing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions regarding appearance in trial.
Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26917 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2017 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria
======================================================
Tanvir @ Md. Tanwir, Son of Zakir @ Md. Zakir, Resident of VillageSisouna Gaiyari, Ward No. 4, Police Station and District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhijeet Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ======================================================
... ... Opposite Party/s
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL
ORAL ORDER
3 20-06-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for grant of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 37804 of 2017 which was rejected vide order dated 07.11.2017.
Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.04.2017 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 287 of 2017, arising out of Araria P.S. Case No. 207 of 2017 for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that his cousin brother was constructing his house for which the petitioner was appointed as mason but due to defective erection of wall of the house there was some quarrel and the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26917 of 2018(3) dt.20-06-2018 2/3
along with others had taken him to purchase bricks but he did not return and his dead body was found near the forest.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal history and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence and because of a quarrel of long time back the petitioner has been made accused. Petitioner is ready to cooperate with the trial on day-today basis.
However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge IIIrd, Araria, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 287 of 2017, arising out of Araria P.S. Case No. 207 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26917 of 2018(3) dt.20-06-2018 3/3
petitioner.
(ii) Petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.
( Nilu Agrawal, J)
Rajesh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the petitioner in view of the evidence and circumstances of the case.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Tanvir @ Md. Tanwir
The State of Bihar
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
