Allowed

Lalbabu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2018CR. MISC./24246/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application of a petitioner under Sections 363 and 366A IPC, charged with aiding in the abduction of a minor girl, was allowed. The High Court noted the petitioner's one-year custody and the delay in FIR but granted bail subject to strict conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount each to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

Lalbabu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24246 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2016 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lalbabu Mahto S/o Late Lakshmi Maho, R/o Vill.- Madhiya, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

Petitioner had earlier moved for bail, which was rejected vide order dated 11.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34691 of 2017. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.03.2017 in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 32 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that petitioner’s wife, Kanti Devi came and took away his 14 year old daughter, Nilam Kumari. It is alleged that the petitioner has also hand in the said abduction.

¶15

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal antecedent and it

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24246 of 2018(2) dt.25-04-2018 2/3

¶17

is on suspicion that he has been made accused. He submits that First Information Report has been lodged after six days of the alleged occurrence and no plausible explanation has been given for such delay. He submits that he has been sufficiently punished and is languishing in judicial custody for more than one year.

¶18

However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 32 of 2016, subject to the conditions that:

¶20

(1) Both the bailors would be close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable properties, who will file an affidavit stating their relationship with the petitioner.

¶21

(2) The petitioner will appear before the learned Court below on each and every

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24246 of 2018(2) dt.25-04-2018 3/3

¶23

date and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail

¶24

cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

(Nilu Agrawal, J.)

¶26

Arjun/-

¶27

U T

Lalbabu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalbabu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Niku and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramnath Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Avinash Rai @ Raja Babu @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Paswan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mehrun Nisha Vs The State Of Bihar