Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a murder case where the victim died by pressing her neck. The Court declined to enlarge the petitioner.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22568 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22568 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2017 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
====================================================== 1. Santosh Kumar S/o Late Sitaram Singh, R/o Vill.- Panapur, Dilawarpur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Bidupur P.S. Case No.203 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is the husband. Victim has died of pressing her neck. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected.
Vinay/U T
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving murder where the victim died due to pressing her neck.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
