Allowed

Neelam Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2018CR. MISC./21585/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail petition filed by two petitioners in a case involving offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 was allowed. The High Court granted bail subject to furnishing a bond and compliance with specific conditions regarding investigation cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to the court below, subject to conditions.

Neelam Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21585 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2018 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Neelam Devi, W/o Rajesh @ Rajesh Chandra Singh @ Ramesh Chandra Singh, R/o Vill.- Doghara, P.O. and P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna, Bihar. 2. Rekha Devi W/o Sachidanand Verma @ Sachidanand Mahto, R/o Vill.Sohra, P.S. and P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sayed Imran Ghani, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 18-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3,4 and 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

¶11

Allegation against the petitioners is that they were involved in immoral traffic of the innocent girls.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the statement of two of such girls was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., wherein they have not alleged anything against anyone.

¶13

Considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail after

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21585 of 2018 (2) dt.18-04-2018

¶15

¶16

completion of the investigation on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bihta Police Station Case No.107 of 2018, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

Nitesh/-

¶19

U T

Neelam Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neelam Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Prasad Vs The Union Of India Through C. B. I.

Babita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Tete Yadav @ Bhikho Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Saddam Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar