Allowed

Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Apr 2018CR. MISC./21412/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to two petitioners accused of theft under Sections 379/34 IPC. The court noted discrepancies between FIR allegations and seizure lists regarding the pump set brand, citing clean antecedents and physical evidence recovery as factors.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of similar amount to the CJM, Araria.

Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21412 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2018 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan, Son of Dukhai

¶5

Mushabbir @ Masbir, Son of Nabir @ Navir Both are residents of Village Matiyari, P.S. Jokihat, District Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sahin Begam ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-04-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶14

learned APP for the State.

¶15

Petitioners, already in custody, seek bail in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.23 of 2018, registered under Sections 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

It transpired during investigation that leading to confessional statement of the petitioners, the pump set as well as battery both were recovered from each one of them.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the specific allegation in the FIR is that pump set of Honda company was stolen whereas the seizure list clearly indicates that the pump set is of Birla Power company and battery is a common article and there was no specification in the FIR,

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21412 of 2018(2) dt.13-04-2018 2/2

¶19

moreover both petitioners have clean antecedent.

¶20

Having considered the aforesaid facts and

¶21

circumstances, petitioners, namely, Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan and Mushabbir @ Masbir are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.23 of 2018.

¶22

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶23

S.KUMAR/-

¶24

U T

Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abul Hassan @ Abu Hassan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parwez Alam Vs The State Of Bihar

Phulchandra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Supen Sardar Vs The State Of Bihar

Maharaja Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar