A single judge allowed the petitioner's prayer to typographically correct the registered order by substituting 'murder of' with 'acid attack on' regarding the subject matter of PS Case No.10/2018.
Prayer for correction in order dated 16.04.2018 was allowed to replace 'murder of' with 'acid attack on'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20266 of 2018
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 16-05-2018 Prayer is for modification in paragraph-3 of the order dated 16.04.2018 to the extent that the words “murder of” be substituted with the words “acid attack on”.
Perused the FIR.
The aforesaid discrepancy is a typographical one. Hence, prayer for correction is allowed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Courtbelow in connection with Purnahia P.S. Case No.10 of 2018.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for typographical correction in the order should be allowed.
Vishal Kumar Ojha
The State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
