Allowed

Lalan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2018CR. MISC./1874/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for bail in a liquor smuggling case involving Sections 38 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016 and relevant IPC provisions, the High Court directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Lalan Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1874 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -337 Year- 2017 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN

¶3

====================================================== Lalan Rai Son of Gulab Rai Resident of Lauva, Police Station - Isuapur, District - Saran

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 24-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶8

The petitioner seeks bail in Madhoura P.S. Case No. 337 of 2017 registered under Sections 30, 38 and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016 and Sections 188 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

1062 litres of foreign liquor is said to have been recovered from the Bolero and Truck in the course of loading the same on the said vehicle and fourteen accused persons named in the written report, who were involved in the occurrence managed to escape.

¶10

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from conscious

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1874 of 2018 (2) dt.24-01-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

physical possession of the petitioner. The petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. He has no concern either with the seized vehicle or with the seized liquor. He has been languishing in custody since 06.11.2017. Similarly situated co-accused, namely, Sonu Rai @ Sonu, Manish @ Manish Kumar and Guddu Tiwari @ Guddu Kumar Tiwary have been enlarged on bail by different co-ordinate benches of this court.

¶14

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VI, Saran in connection with Madhoura P.S. Case No. 337 of 2017.

¶15

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶16

Mishra/-

¶17

U T

Lalan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashish Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashish Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Jayant Kumar @ Chunnu Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar