Dismissed

Jitendra Thakur @ Jitendra Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2018CR. MISC./18637/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners seeking anticipatory bail in a case alleging kidnapping and sexual offence against a minor were denied due to physical evidence of physical relationship with the victim and victim statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; direction to surrender before the Court below for regular bail.

Jitendra Thakur @ Jitendra Kumar and Anr. Vs The… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18637 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHIYARA District- SITAMARHI

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Jitendra Thakur @ Jitendra Kumar,

¶6

Sikindar Thakur @ Sikand Thakur Both Sons of Late Bindeshwar Thakur, R/o Village- Jalsi, P.S.- Sahiyara, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Nazir Ansari, A.P.P.

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 19-06-2018 Heard the parties.

¶15

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Sahiuara P. S. Case No. 90 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 372/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are full brothers and they have not committed such type of offence.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioners are full brothers and they have

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18637 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018

¶20

2/2

¶21

committed physical relationship with the minor daughter of the informant.

¶22

In view of the facts and circumstances discussed above and all materials available on the record and the statement recorded by the victim girl under Section 164 of Cr. P. C. about the commission of rape by the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioners that if the petitioners surrender before the Court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, this application is

¶24

dismissed.

¶25

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶26

Sudha/-

¶27

U T

Jitendra Thakur @ Jitendra Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Thakur @ Jitendra Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sattar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Neel Kamal Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Praveen Kumar Mandal @ Prabin Kumar Mandal @ Gajua Vs State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar