Allowed

Satyendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Mar 2018CR. MISC./17457/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving dowry harassment and IPC charges. The Single Judge allowed the petition, granting bail for six weeks upon surrender to the local court, subject to conditions and bond deposits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail within six weeks of 27.03.2018 upon surrender to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, subject to conditions and bond deposit of Rs. 10,00/-.

Satyendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17457 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satyendra Singh S/o Ram Subhag Singh, R/o Village- Tendua Tola, P.S.Karghar (Barhari), District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SURESH PRASAD SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 27-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

¶11

for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 494, 323, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17457 of 2018(2) dt.27-03-2018 2/2

¶16

this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶17

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 15/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Pankaj/-

¶21

U T

Satyendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhuar Chaudhary @ Dhanesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Salauddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sintu Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sri Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar