Allowed

Navin Mishra v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC26 Jun 2018CR. MISC./17275/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application regarding an FIR under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, and 120(B) IPC, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a businessman facing allegations of causing revenue loss, subject to specific conditions and a six-week window for surrender.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000 with two local sureties upon Rs.25,000 each.

Navin Mishra Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17275 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2015 Thana -ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR DistrictPATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Navin Mishra Son of Sri Ramesh Chandra Mishra Proprietor of Shree Ganpati Enterprises, resident of Kaurihar Chauk Mahavir Nagar, Raxaul, Ward No. 19, P.S. Raxaul, District East Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

The Inspector General, Economic Offence, Unit Bihar, Patna.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Adv. Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Adv. For the EOU : Sri V.N.P. Sinha, Sr.Adv. Ms.Soni Shrivastava

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 26-06-2018 Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Economical Offences P.S.Case No.01 of 2015 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Allegation against the petitioner is that he is a businessman and he is not named in the FIR as he has caused loss of revenue to the government.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is no way related to the coal business and he has a mobile shop and in spite of that the petitioner has been made accused in this

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17275 of 2018 (4) dt.26-06-2018

¶14

2/3

¶15

case. Further submission is that several other accused persons having similar allegation have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.46961 of 2017, order dated 39052 of 2017, order dated 21.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.53817 of 2017 and order dated 7.12.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.46970 of 2017.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned Sr. Counsel for the EOU.

¶17

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Economic Offence P.S.Case no.01 of 2015, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

With following conditions :

¶19

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

¶20

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶21

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17275 of 2018 (4) dt.26-06-2018

¶23

3/3

¶24

required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

¶25

With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed.

¶26

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

chn/-

¶28

U T

Navin Mishra v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navin Mishra v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikki Yadav @ Dipak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Gobardhan Yadav Vs State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Mandal @ Ramesh Mandal Vs State of Bihar

Sheo Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Rai @ Surendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramawati Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar