This Court rejected the petitioners' prayer for anticipatory bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16348 of 2018, finding no fresh ground to grant bail after the earlier rejection via a speaking order dated 08.02.2018 in Cr. Misc. no. 929 of 2018.
The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16348 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-593 Year-2017 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Mahto For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2 02-05-2018
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court by speaking order vide order dated 08.02. 2018 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 929 of 2018 after looking into the entire allegation against these petitioners as well as materials in the case diary . Therefore, this Court does not find any fresh ground to grant anticipatory bail.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
shyambihari/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given the earlier rejection in Cr. Misc. no. 929 of 2018.
Radha Sinha @ Radha; Dr. Ganpat Mandal
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
