Ravish Kumar @ Ravish Kumar Patel v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants no substantive ruling on the bail application in a murder case, merely recording the hearing of counsel for both sides before proceeding without a final decision in the provided text.
What the court decided
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15821 of 2018 (2) dt.19-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15821 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 2017 Thana -BARHARA District- PURNIA
======================================================
- Ravish Kumar @ Ravish Kumar Patel, Son of Shyam Sunder Mandal, Resident of Village- Matihani, P.S.- Barhara (Raghubansh Nagar), DistrictPurnea. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mustaque Alam
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 19-03-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.
Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in Barhara PS Case No. 263 of 2017, registered under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner charged with murder by specific allegations not shared by another accused who was admitted to bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ravish Kumar @ Ravish Kumar Patel
- respondent
State of Bihar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court