Allowed

Ram Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2018CR. MISC./15409/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court considered an application for bail under Section 437 CrPC regarding offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and IPC related to liquor recovery and granted bail on furnishing bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Ram Babu Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15409 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2017 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Babu Rai S/o Shambhu Rai, R/o Ayodhya Bari @ Ayodhyawari, P.S.Muffasil, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-04-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 309a), 38(i)(ii) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that 48.3 liters wine is recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.01.2018. Chargesheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 48.3 liters wine is recovered from the car in question. Petitioner was a co-passenger in the said car.

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15409 of 2018(2) dt.02-04-2018 2/2

¶18

He had no knowledge regarding the liquor being kept in the car. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum- Special Judge, Excise Act, Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 212/2017 (G.R. No. 3845/2017).

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Pankaj/-

¶23

U T

Ram Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrendra Kumar Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar

Imteyaz Ansari @ Md. Aitaz and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghuveer Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjan Bind Vs The State Of Bihar