Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2018CR. MISC./14282/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120B, and 34 IPC, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, noting the allegation involved certificates from an unrecognized institution rather than a direct charge of forgery. The court ordered release on a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14282 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2017 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Kumar S/o Shambhu Mahto, R/o Village- Gowar Dharmpur, P.O.Nawada, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SRI PANCHANAND PANDIT ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No.468 of 2017, registered under Sections 467/468/471/420/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation in brief is that while applying for appointment on compassionate ground, the petitioner was seeking the appointment on the basis of certificate issued by unrecognized institution.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation of forged document rather it is alleged that certificates were obtained from unrecognized institution and other similarly situated co-accused Jagjiwan Paswan and Munna Kumar have been admitted to bail by this Court by orders dated 23.02.2018

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14282 of 2018(2) dt.13-03-2018 2/2

¶17

and 06.03.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos.10943 of 2018 and 12651 of 2018 respectively.

¶18

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, petitioner Santosh Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VI, Patna in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No.468 of 2017.

¶19

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶20

S.KUMAR/-

¶21

U T

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Pal @ Ashok Paul and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukhiya Yadav @ Mukhia Yadav and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Suraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Anshu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raj Kumar Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar