Allowed

Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Mantu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC8 Mar 2018CR. MISC./13309/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13309 of 2018, directed the release of the petitioner on bail in a case under Sections 498A and 494 IPC involving dowry deaths. The court imposed a bail bond along with two sureties upon production of a complaint case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Mantu Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13309 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -322 Year- 2015 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE DistrictMADHEPURA

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Mantu, S/o Shivnandan Ram, R/o VillageMohanpur Choumukh, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Smt. Rekha Devi, W/o Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram, D/o Sitraram Ram, R/o Village- Mohanpur Choumukh, P.S.- Bihariganj, DistrictMadhepura Presently residing at Village- Uda, P.O.- Madhuwan, P.S.Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 30.04.2017 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) and 494 of the IPC.

¶13

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶14

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13309 of 2018 (2) dt.08-03-2018

¶16

2/2

¶17

allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

¶18

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Udakishunganj, in connection with Complaint Case No. 322 of 2015.

¶20

U.K./U T

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Mantu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mantu Ram @ Ajay Ram @ Mantu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meena Devi @ Sudama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sambhu Rishideo Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Shamsad @ Shamsad Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mayank Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Rai Vs The State Of Bihar