Allowed

Santosh Manjhi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2018CR. MISC./12012/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners in PS Case No.44 of 2016, involving offences of rioting, affray, and criminal intimidation, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties each of like amount within six weeks.

Santosh Manjhi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12012 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12012 of 2018

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -BELCHHI District- PATNA

¶5

====================================================== 1. Santosh Manjhi, aged about 34 years, son of Ramprit Manjhi. 2. Love Kumar @ Lav Kumar @ Lab Kumar @ Labh Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Ghuleten Paswan @ Ghuleten Mandal, both resident of village- Belchhi, P.S.- Belchhi, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶7

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Belchhi P.S. Case No.44 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 353 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

Allegation has been made that on 25.09.2016 the police got information that 30-40 persons entered into the campus of the police station and destroyed some records. They were anger dues to an incident which happened one day before in which a co-accused Priya Ranjan @ Monu was caught by the police in vehicle checking. It is also alleged that police resorted to lathi charge for controlling the situation and also made a video-

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12012 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018

¶10

¶11

graph of this incident and on the basis of footage of that video these petitioner along with other co-accused were found involved in the occurrence.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits save and except omnibus allegation nothing specific has been mentioned against the petitioners. He further submits that other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court.

¶13

Looking to the nature of allegation, let the abovenamed petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Barh, in connection with Belchhi P.S. Case No.44 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶15

pawan/-

¶16

U T

Santosh Manjhi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Manjhi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Bhuvneshwar Sahay Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Laxman Das and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Baban Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Om Prakash Sahni @ Om Prakash @ Dahaur Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Das Thakur Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Roshan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar