Criminal miscellaneous petition filed by two accused persons facing trial for railway sabotage under the R.P. (U.P.) Act. The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioners upon furnishing bail bonds and surety amounts.
Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11337 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2017 Thana- SAMSTIPUR RPF/POST DistrictSamastipur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
3 04-04-2018
Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since
03.12.2017 in connection with RPF/ SPJ P.S. Case No. 8 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 3 of the R.P. (U.P.) Act.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that petitioners were apprehended and on search burnt copper wire of railway and some instrument like blade, screw driver were recovered from their possession. Accordingly, two seizure-lists were prepared.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11337 of 2018(3) dt.04-04-2018 2/2
petitioners that they are innocent, bear no criminal antecedent and nothing has been recovered from their possession and a false case has been instituted by the police officials. He submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering with the prosecution witnesses by the petitioners.
However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (R), Samastipur in connection with RPF/ SPJ P.S. Case No. 8 of 2017.
Arjun/-
U T
(Nilu Agrawal, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail pending trial in a case related to railway sabotage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Das @ Ajay Kumar
Manjay Kumar
The State Of Bihar
NILU AGRAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
