appellants submitted that the case was registered against Tuntun Sah and three unknown. However, in the present case, the police submitted charge-sheet against six persons. Out of six persons Shiv Jee Sah died during trial and Tuntun Sah also died during the pendency of the appeal. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the trial court has failed to appreciate the various aspects of the matter, which indicates innocence of the appellants. He firstly submitted that in the present case apart from Tuntun Sah, the case was registered against three unknown, as such, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to identify the three unknown, but during trial none of the appellants were put on Test Identification Parade for identification and as such conviction of the appellants without T.I. Parade is without any evidence. He submitted that in the present case, the police has completed perfunctory investigation and merely on the basis of suspicion charge-sheeted the appellants. He submitted that the definite case of the prosecution was that 90,000/- and 30,000/- currency was in the denomination of Rs.50/- and Rs.100/-. The so-called seizure from the house of the appellants is not conclusive material to suggest that the money/currency seized from the residence of the appellants, in fact was the looted currency, as the prosecution has miserably failed to explain that the amount recovered from the house of the appellants were of denomination of Rs.50-/ and Rs. 100/- and as such learned
