regard, it is to be noticed that both the parties, that means to say, informant as well as appellant happens to be the co villagers and on account thereof, there was no occasion for the appellant to ask for the way to Jaunpur from the informant. It is also evident that at an initial stage, the informant had not shown PW-1, Baso Rai his cousin brother being along with him. Informant had disclosed that he along with Baso were coming from Dumri market after purchasing vegetable over bicycle which is found contrary to his earlier version and to that extent, contradiction has been put to him while, PW-1 had stated that they both were coming on their food. Informant had claimed that soon after sustaining of the injury, he became unconscious and regained sense at PMCH, after two days where his fard-beyan was recorded while PW-4 and 5 have stated that he had not become unconscious rather was conscious and had talked with them, and disclosed the name of the appellant. Now the aforesaid inconsistency are seen in the background of evidence of PW-8, doctor, it is evident that with regard to nature of the injury, the doctor had opined that let it be at the end of the doctor who had attended the injured at the first instance. That means to say, before coming to PMCH, PW-2, informant was already taken to the doctor which, none of the witness had deposed. Furthermore, during course of investigation, the Investigating Officer failed to investigate on that very score.
