Allowed

Manager Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2018CR. APP (SJ)/505/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the conviction order. The court found the prosecution failed to properly identify the appellants as aggressors due to a free fight scenario. Land possession evidence was weak due to lack of independent witnesses and contradicting facts regarding the place of occurrence.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment set aside; appellants discharged from liability of bail bonds.

Manager Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.505 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2009 Thana -VIJAYPUR District- GOPALGANJ

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Manager Singh Son of late Chanari Singh

¶6

Jagdish Singh Son of late Chanari Singh

¶7

Ramswaroop Singh Son of late Chanari Singh

¶8

Gulab Singh son of Manager Singh All are Resident of village- Birwat ,Police Station Vijaipur, District Gopalganj. .... .... Appellant/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s

¶11

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Tripathi, Amicus Curiae For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP

¶12

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-05-2018

¶13

No one appears on behalf of appellant on repeated

¶14

calls, whereupon, Sri Arun Kumar Tripathi has been requested to assist as an Amicus Curiae.

¶15

Appellants, Manager Singh, Jagdish Singh, Ramswaroop Singh, Gulab Singh have been found guilty for an offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and each one has been sentenced to undergo RI for one year, under Section 341 IPC and each one has been sentenced to undergo SI for one month with a further

¶16

direction to run the sentences concurrently vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.8.2017, by 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 346/2010.

¶17

PW-3, Hari Prasad Yadav filed a written report on 27.03.2009 disclosing therein that they have got possession over Khesra No- 330, Area 4 decimal, Khesra No- 422, Area 2 decimal irrespective of having its nature Gairmajarua Malik . Today i.e., on

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018

¶19

¶20

27.03.2009, Manager Singh, Ramswaroop Singh, Jagdish Singh and Gulab Singh attempted to encroach over the same which was resisted, as a result of which, they all began to assault with Lathi and axe. Manager Singh gave axe blow over head of his mother, Lalita Devi causing injury thereupon. Other family members of his house have also been assaulted by the others. Gulab Singh snatched away his wrist watch, mobile as well as Ramswaroop Singh snatched away Mangalsutra from the neck of his wife. On hue and cry, villagers assembled, seeing whom, the accused persons escaped therefrom.

¶21

After registration of Vijaypur PS- Case No. 25/2009 investigation commenced and after concluding the same, charge-sheet was submitted, facilitating the trial, meeting with the ultimate result, subject matter of instant appeal.

¶22

Defence case as is evident from mode of crossexamination as well as statement recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C is that of complete denial. It has also been pleaded that accused persons forcibly tried to encroach upon their land which was resisted and during course thereof, they were assaulted and for that Vijaypur PS- Case No. 26/09 was registered wherein charge-sheet has also been submitted. Certain documents have been exhibited in order to substantiate this case.

¶23

Prosecution, in order to prove its case have examined altogether five PWs who are PW-1 Indu Devi, PW-2, Lalita

¶24

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018

¶25

¶26

Devi, PW-3, Hari Prasad Yadav, PW-4, Yogeshwar Ram and PW-5, Dr. Nurool Bassar. Side by side had also exhibited, Ext.1 signature of PW.3/informant over written report, Ext- 1/1, endorsement over the written report, Ext-2 Formal FIR, Ext-3, 3/1 injury report of Lalita Devi, Ext-3/2, 3/3 injury report of Indu Devi.

¶27

Though no oral evidence has been adduced on behalf of defence but, Ext-A, c.c of order of cognizance relating to Vijaypur PS. Case No. 26/09, Ext-B c.c of FIR of Vijaypur PS. Case No. 26/09, Ext-C, c.c of charge-sheet of Vijaypur PS. Case No. 26/09 have been made exhibits.

¶28

Heard learned amicus curiae for the appellant and

¶29

learned APP.

¶30

Also gone through the records. It is apparent that whoever been examined are the mother, son, daughter-in-law. Not even a single independent witness has been examined. In the aforesaid background, when the version of the prosecution has been gone through, it is apparent that PW-1, PW-2 and PW-3 have asserted that PW-1 was assaulted by lathi, danda while PW-2 Lalita Devi was given single axe blow over her head. She was not assaulted furthermore. Although, PW-3 had claimed that he had also been assaulted, no injury report is found relating to him. When the evidence of PW-5 has been gone through, it is apparent that he had not found sharp cut injury over person of PW-2 Lalita Devi. Furthermore he had

¶31

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018

¶32

¶33

found four injuries caused by hard and blunt substance over the person of Lalita Devi, all simple in nature and in likewise manner, two injuries have been found over the person of Indu Devi, PW-1 caused by hard and blunt substance, simple in nature.

¶34

From the evidence of PW-2, it is evident that she had accepted presence of counter case as well as injury having over the person of wife of Manager Singh as well as wife of Ramswaroop Singh but for that, she explained that those injuries were as self inflicted injuries. Furthermore, there happens to be an admission at their end that counter case has also been registered. When the evidence of PW-4, Para-7 has been gone through, it is apparent that he was I.O of both the cases. He had further deposed that there was free fight amongst both the parties.

¶35

Now coming to the place of occurrence, the prosecution party, from their initial version, whereunder they have disclosed that accused persons have tried to disposses them, narrated that they were filling earth which was protested and for that occurrence had taken place, happens to be development which is evident from the evidence of PW-4, I.O para-2.

¶36

Apart from this, PW-4 during course of inspection of place of occurrence had not found the place of occurrence being filled by the soil. So, the motive is found not at all substantiated. Furthermore, from the evidence of PW-4, it is evident

¶37

¶38

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018

¶39

that there was no occasion for the prosecution party to have their possession over the land as the house of prosecution party lies other side of the road while place of occurrence happens to be in between the house of the appellant, Manager Singh and the road having length of four hands and the same is found duly incorporated with the specific boundary North-Aklu Singh, South- Manager Singh, EastHari Prasad Yadav and West- Jagdish Singh.

¶40

During cross-examination at Para-5, he had reiterated the same. PW-1 at Para-7, had also reiterated the same. PW2 Para-6 had also substantiated the same. She had further stated that with regard to aforesaid land both the parties have contested at an earlier occasion. She had further stated that brother of Manager Singh has got possession over the same. She had further explained that now they have raised dispute over the area having in their possession. Informant, PW-3 at Para-4, had stated that his forefathers were saying that this land happens to be their Khatiyani land but he is unable to disclose name of his grandfather. In Para-5, he had stated that though there was case at an earlier occasion but he is unable to say whether he lost. Then had disclosed that learned counsel will explain the same. Then had said that he is not knowing plot number. As the members of the police have disclosed plot number, so he had incorporated the same. In Para-8, he had further identified the land to be in between the house of Manager Singh as well as road. Then had submitted at Para-

¶41

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.505 of 2015 dt.02-05-2018

¶42

¶43

10 that after institution of the case he got necessary information regarding the land under dispute whereupon, he came to know that it happens to be Bhoodani land. In Para-14, he had stated that though the case had been instituted at the end of Manager Singh but none of his family members sustained injury. In Para-15, he had stated that he had sustained injury in between the house of Manager Singh as well as road.

¶44

Considering the evidence in its totality, it is apparent that neither the place of occurrence has been substantiated nor the manner of occurrence. There happens to be free fight and in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to have properly identified the appellants to be aggressor wherein they failed. That being so, the judgment impugned is set aside.

¶45

Appeal is allowed. Since appellants are on bail, they are discharged from the liability of the bail bonds.

¶46

The first and last pages of the instant judgment may be handed over to the Amicus Curiae for the needful.

¶47

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶48

perwez

¶49

AFR/NAFR	AFR
CAV DATE	N/A
UploadingDate	03/05/2018
Transmission Date	03/05/2018

Manager Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manager Singh and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baidyanath Choudhary and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Aslam Vs The State Of Bihar

Kameshwar Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Akalu Rai @ Aklu Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Moti Lal Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Basant Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar