the assault by means of knife. Then had denied the suggestion that he was a characterless person. He used to tease daughter of Sita Ram Singh and in the aforesaid background, had intruded inside the house of Sita Ram Singh, whereupon villagers seen, assembled and assaulted. Then thereafter, with an intention to harass the accused persons, got this case filed. Then, as is evident that on a prayer made by the prosecution dated 10.03.2015, both the parties were heard and vide order dated 28.04.2015, this PW-4 was recalled in order to explain Para-7 of his cross-examination, whereupon he was reexamined on 01.05.2015. At Para-9, there was question put to him in a form “by which weapon Sita Ram Singh had assaulted him. Answer-Sita Ram Singh assaulted him with knife over his neck.” During cross-examination at Para-10, he had stated that whatever been deposed by him today, is the correct evidence and whatever been deposed at his end at an earlier occasion happens to be false. Paras-12, 13 happens to be on that very score. In Para-14, he had stated that his neck was cut and at that very time, he was lying. In Para-15, he had stated that he had tried to save himself and for that, he had twisted his neck. He had also resisted by way of sprawling. Also tried to raise alarm. Neck was cut, blood had fallen over the ground as well as his cloth also became soaked therewith. In Para-20, he had further stated that he used to talk with the daughter of Sita Ram Singh. At Para-23,
