had not claimed the aforesaid Neem tree nor disputed over the same. Then had admitted that he has got document to substantiate his claim over the Neem tree. In Para-5, he had stated that during course of gossiping at his darwaza, his wife Girja Devi and daughter-in-law Rupa Devi were present. Then had said that when the accused persons came, at that very time, he was over the roof engaged in cutting branch of Neem tree, whereupon accused persons protested. He had not found cut trunk of the tree. In Para-6, he had stated that all the accused persons had not come conjointly rather on call of Harihar Singh, rest of the accused persons came. Even seeing that accused persons were armed with deadly weapon, he had not called his son, daughter-in-law. In Para-7, he had stated that he got down from the roof through the Neem tree. When he got down, the accused persons began to assault. He is unable to say how many blows were given. At that very time, his son, daughter-in-law were not present. In Para-8, he had stated that his daughter-in-law was assaulted, but he had not inquired from her, who had assaulted her. He had seen blood over her cloth. In Para-9, there happens to be disclosure of location of houses of different persons in his vicinity. At Para-10, he had shown his ignorance with regard to institution of a case at the end of appellant Pano Devi before institution of this case. Then had denied the suggestion that to save their skin, this case has been filed.
