Allowed

Mohan Trigun v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Sept 2018CR. APP (SJ)/3469/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of bail. Granting bail to the appellant in a case involving murder and alleged atrocities under the SC/ST Act, with conditions regarding sureties and cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Appellant released on bail with bond of Rs.20,000/- and two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions on residency and cooperation.

Mohan Trigun Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3469 of 2018

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -75 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR

¶4

=========================================================== Mohan Trigun, Son of Shiv Mangal Trigun, R/o Village-Khiri, P.S.- Rajpur, District-Buxar.

¶5

.... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Dharmendra Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Smt. Usha Kumari No.1, SPP

¶6

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-09-2018

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶8

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 18.08.2018 in SC/ST Case No.156 of 2017 passed by the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Buxar, in connection with Rajpur Police Station Case No.75 of 2017 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v)(a)(b) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶9

According to FIR, co-accused- Santosh Tiwary

¶10

fired at Kamta Ram, which caused injury at the back, as a result whereof, Kamta Ram died subsequently. The appellant is

¶11

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3469 of 2018 dt.13-09-2018

¶12

2/2

¶13

not named in the FIR. Apparently, the name of appellant has surfaced during investigation on suspicion.

¶14

In the circumstances, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

¶15

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

¶16

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶17

Nitesh/-

¶18

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
UploadingDate	14.09.2018
Transmission Date	14.09.2018

Mohan Trigun v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Trigun v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Musha Vs The State Of Bihar

Sriniwas Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Janardan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Nand Kumar Jaiswal and Ors. Vs National High Way Authority Of India Through Its Chairman and Ors.

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Binda Singh Vs The State Of Bihar