proceeded. If this evidence is to be believed the same is contrary to the prosecution story. As prosecution case is that it is Balbir who has taken Sanjiv Choudhary. Further, according to PW 3 he had seen them on 18.6.2000 but he had not narrated the same to the informant and even though FIR has been lodged after five days and no such story has been given in FIR. Similarly, evidence of PW 4 shows that he had seen one Maruti Van coming from the market in which the victim Sanjiv was there and when he arrived near the vehicle accused Gorelal commanded the driver to proceed and the Maruti had proceeded and he saw Gorelal, Sanjiv and one unknown person in the car and also saw Rajiv Jha driving the Maruti Van. However, his evidence further shows in cross examination that accused persons pressed mouth of Sanjiv Choudhary and Sanjiv could not convey any message to him and he was forbidden by Gorelal to speak. His evidence also shows that Sanjiv did not insist for stopping the vehicle. However, the conduct of PW 4 that he had not state the informant and there is no much story in FIR, creates doubt about the prosecution evidence.
