story to him and furthermore it appears that there is delay of more than one month in lodging the FIR. No doubt it is stated that mother of the victim girl was waiting for the informant to come to the house from Benaras but she has not even approached the local Choukidar or Gram Panchayat person or any other person with respect to the kidnapping of her daughter, which creates doubt about the prosecution story. Apart from that, evidence of P.W.2, who is brother of the victim girl, shows that while he boarded the train along with his sister the appellant also boarded the same compartment and asked him to get down from the train and when he refused to do so he was pushed from the train and his cross examination shows that the compartment was full and the same must be noticed by other passengers also and even the girl, who is aged 18-19 years as per evidence of P.W.3, has not raised any alarm and all these facts create doubt about manner of occurrence. Further P.W.2 has not approached the police personnel and nobody comes for help, rather FIR has been lodged after more than one month of the occurrence, which casts doubt about the prosecution story also. However, learned trial court has not considered the aforesaid aspects of the matter and he tried to explain the delay on the ground that as informant was not present, as such, there is delay in lodging FIR but learned trial court has failed to understand that even if the informant was not present at the time of occurrence, the mother or brother of the victim girl ought to have informed the local Choukidar or Gram Panchayat persons or any other person about the
