Dismissed

Jatan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2018CR. APP (SJ)/1568/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna rejected the appellant's bail appeal under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (PoA) Act. Despite a co-accused being granted bail, the Court refused bail due to the serious allegation that the appellant fired a rifle at the deceased. The trial was directed to be expedited.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; appeal disposed of; trial directed to be expedited.

Jatan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1568 of 2018 (5) dt.11-07-2018

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1568 of 2018

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2015 Thana -BIND District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF)

¶5

====================================================== Jatan Yadav

¶6

.... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Md. Harun Quareshi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶7

05 11.07.2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶8

This appeal has been preferred under section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Act, 1989 against order dated 12.4.2018 passed by the Ist Addl. Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Sessions trial no. 139/2016 arising out of Bind P.S. case no. 01/2015 by which and whereunder he refused to release the appellant on bail.

¶9

The contention on behalf of the appellant is that one co-accused Pramod Yadav against whom there is allegation that he, too, fired on the deceased, has already been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate bench of this

¶10

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1568 of 2018 (5) dt.11-07-2018

¶11

¶12

court vide order dated 13.3.2018 passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) no. 3412/2017 which is evident from perusal of annexure 6 to the petition.

¶13

No doubt, co-accused Pramod Yadav has been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate bench of this court but taking note of this fact that appellant is said to have fired from his rifle which hit on the chest of the deceased and, therefore, I do not feel it proper to extend the privilege of bail to the appellant and accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected and in the aforesaid manner, this appeal stands disposed of.

¶14

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the appellant and try to conclude the same as early as possible.

¶15

shahid

¶16

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J)

¶17

U T

Jatan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rabindra Saw Vs .

Bankatesh Sharma @ Binkatesh Sharma @ Venktesh Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lakhindra Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Nunnu Sah @ Nunu Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Kajru Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Praveen Kumar Vs Navin Kumar and Ors.