Single judge criminal appeal rejected. High Court found no interference needed as reasons assigned in impugned judgment were adequate. Disposition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1025 of 2018 (5) dt.19-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1025 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2007 Thana -SC/ST District- BHAGALPUR
====================================================== Brahamdeo Kumar Ravi, son of Pairu Das, resident of village Purani SAai, P.S. Nathnagar, District-Bhagalpur.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
5 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned
Additional P.P.
Perused the judgment impugned.
The reason has been assigned under para 10 of the judgment
whereupon needs no interference.
Accordingly, it is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
Sanjeev/-
U T
Brahamdeo Kumar Ravi
State of Bihar
Sudama Mandal
Arvind Kumar Sharma
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
