Appeal against writ order dismissing petition for issuance of passed certificate after delayed re-evaluation. Court upheld writ court finding praying for employment after 20 years was not maintainable.
Petition dismissed; writ court order upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.243 of 2018
IN
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16878 of 2017
=========================================================== Rajesh Kumar Son of Raja Ram Yadav, Resident of Indrapuri Colony Ward No. 07, P.O. & P.S.-Bettiah, District-West Champaran.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Abhitabh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 16-04-2018
Delay of one day in filing of the appeal is condoned. I.A. No.1611 of 2018 is allowed and disposed of.
Seeking exception to an order passed by the learned Writ Court on 15.1.2018 in C.W.J.C. No.16878 of 2017, petitioner
has filed this appeal under Clause-X of the Letter Patent. Petitioner
Patna High Court LPA No.243 of 2018 dt.16-04-2018
2/3
was student who appeared in the Intermediate Examination conducted by the Bihar Intermediate Education Council, Patna in the year 1998. He was declared as failed in the subject of Chemistry and according to him, he filed an application for re-evaluation. The re-evaluation was granted and he was awarded 90 marks in paper and subsequently, he declared “passed”. However, having done so in the year 1998 for reasons that remain unexplained petitioner kept quite till 2017.
In the meanwhile, based on the educational qualification obtained petitioner sought employment under the District Education Officer, Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh and while being service for 20 years, filed a writ petition by contending that after re-evaluation the correct marks sheet and the passed certificate has not been issued.
A counter affidavit was filed by the successor to the Bihar Intermediate Education Council namely, the Bihar School Examination Board and that on scrutiny of the records they find that on re-evaluation no change was recorded. The prayer for re-evaluation was rejected and the petitioner was declared failed. It is specifically stated in the counter affidavit that in collusion with some employees of the Board the petitioner has manipulated in the record and having is shown as passed and was now trying to get the marks sheet after 20 years. The learned Writ Court dismissed the petition on the ground of delay and finding there to be serious disputed questions of fact.
Patna High Court LPA No.243 of 2018 dt.16-04-2018
3/3
In our considered view, the learned Writ Court has
committed no error in passing the impugned order warranting
reconsideration. The petition stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
N.H./-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N/A |
| UploadingDate | 19-04-2018 |
| Transmission Date |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ court committed an error in dismissing the petition regarding delayed re-evaluation of examination marks.
Whether the claim for employment based on erroneously declared passed status is maintainable.
Rajesh Kumar
State of Bihar
Bihar School Examination Board
The Chief Justice
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
