The High Court held the appeal infructuous and consigned it to records because the respondent had already joined his parent department after deputation. No decision on merits was made.
Appeal consigned to records as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1251 of 2017 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6235 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Shri Mrigendra Kumar, learned counsel for the State of Bihar submits that since the respondent-petitioner after completion of his period of deputation has already joined his
Patna High Court LPA No.1251 of 2017(5) dt.28-11-2018 2/2
parent department, and therefore, according to him the appeal itself has become infructuous. It is accordingly consigned to records.
(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ)
(Anjana Mishra, J)
P.K.P./-R.S.Sen
U
State of Bihar
Lallan Kumar Pandey
Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
