In a second appeal where the appellant failed to appear and comply with directions for service of notice, the court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court SA No.374 of 1989 (13) dt.12-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.374 of 1989
======================================================
Sachidanand Verma .... .... Appellant/s Versus Late Kapil Deo Narayan Lal through L.Rs. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Giridhar Mandal For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
13 12-10-2017 No one appears on behalf of the appellant. No one had appeared on 11.09.2017 nor the appellant complied the order dated 11.09.2017 whereby the direction was to take steps for service of notice on respondent No.3 and on substituted heirs of deceased respondent No.2.
In the circumstance, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Nitesh/-
U
Sachidanand Verma
Kapil Deo Narayan Lal L.Rs.
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
