The Patna High Court dismissed a civil review application filed by a petitioner challenging an earlier judgment regarding State employment matters, holding the review lacked merit as it sought to reargue the case rather than correct errors.
Civil Review Application No.75 of 2016 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.75 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22637 of 2013
====================================================== Sumitra Kumari, wife of Ram Ayodhya Prasad, resident of Village: Rakashiya, P.S Dulhin Bazar, District Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nityanand, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. K.K.Jha, AAG-14 Mr. Amish Jha, AC to AAG-14
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
2 01-03-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the
State.
The review application is dismissed because what the petitioner is trying to urge is not to point out any legal or factual inaccuracy in the order but to innovate and reargue the application as a desperate measure to overcome the adjudication already made on the earlier round of application.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.75 of 2016 (2) dt.01-03-2017
2/2
The civil review application is dismissed being
devoid of merit.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Pawan/-
U
Sumitra Kumari
The State of Bihar
Sangita Kumari
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
