This short order notes that disputed drugs were returned to the petitioner. Consequently, the High Court found no need to proceed further and disposed of the miscellaneous application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.4279 of 2016 (5) dt.07-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4279 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9376 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG 9 S. D. Yadav
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
Both parties have stated that drugs in question have been returned to the petitioner.
In such view of the matter, there is no need to proceed further in the matter.
Accordingly this application is disposed of.
Vinay/-
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
U
M/s Preeti Drug Agencies Proprietor Ritesh Prasad Gupta
The State of Bihar
Sri Rabindra Kumar
Srimati Kamla Kumari
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
