Allowed

Kumar Ved Prakash and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Patna HC13 Nov 2017MJC/3240/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous application concerning allegations of contempt, the Patna High Court declined to initiate contempt proceedings. The court granted liberty to the applicants to challenge the impugned action afresh in accordance with law and disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to applicants to challenge the complained of action afresh in accordance with law. Application disposed.

Kumar Ved Prakash and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The… — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3240 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kumar Ved Prakash, Son of Nawal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village- Sultanpur, Ward No.5, Sultanpur, Panchayat Raj, Post Office Sultanpur, Police Station- Deshari, District- Vaishali at Hazipur.

¶4

Amarkant Singh @ Ramji Singh, so of Late Jayram Singh, Resident of Village- Chidiya Bazar Sonpur, Post Office+Post Station- Sonpur, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director General of Police , Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Principal Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Principal Secretary, Bihar Tourism Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶12

The Additional Chief Conservator of Forest cum Chief Wild Life Warden, Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Bhaart Jyoti.

¶13

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division at Chapra namely Narmdeshwar Lal.

¶14

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra namely Harihar Prasad.

¶15

The District Forest Officer, Chapra, District- Saran at Chapra namely Sri Lachendra Pandit.

¶16

The Superintendent of Police, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶17

Sub-Divisional Officer, Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶18

Circle Officer, Sonpur Block/Circle, District- Saran at Chapra.

¶19

Officer-in-Charge Sonpur Police Station District- Saran at Chapra.

¶20

... ... Respondent/s

¶21

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s :

¶22

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶23

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶24

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶25

2 13-11-2017 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are not

¶26

inclined to initiate action for contempt based on the allegations

¶27

Patna High Court MJC No.3240 of 2017(2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2

¶28

made in this application. However, liberty shall be available to the applicants to challenge the action complained of afresh in

¶29

accordance with law.

¶30

The application stands disposed of.

¶31

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶32

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶33

P.K.P.

¶34

Kumar Ved Prakash and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Ved Prakash and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Baboolal Mahato Vs State of Bihar

Jai Nandan Singh @ Mohani Vs State of Bihar

Siya Ram Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Green Leather Industries Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijay Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.