Disposed

Sunita Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC8 Nov 2017MJC/2742/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought contempt action against respondents for delaying the decision of an appeal regarding Aanganwari Sahaika appointment. The court directed the Collector to decide the case within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction for the respondent Collector to decide the pending appeal on appointment of Aanganwari Sahaika within 30 days.

Sunita Kumari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2742 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sunita Kumari, Wife of Sri Vijay Prasad,

¶4

Bachchi Devi Wife Of Late Dhaneshwar Mistri Both Are Resident Of Village - Barraji, P.S. Kauwakol, District - Nawada

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

Sri Narbdeshwar Lal, The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya

¶9

Sri Kaushal Kumar, The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Nawada

¶10

Sri Md. Sritula, The District Programme Officer, Nawada

¶11

Smt. Priti Kumari, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nawada

¶12

Tripati Sinha W/O Not Known The Then Child Development Project Officer (C.D.P.O), Block - Kauwakol, District - Nawada

¶13

Sunita Kumari W/O Not Known The Then Women Supervisor, Block - Kauwakol, District - Nawada

¶14

... ... Opp.Parties

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to ( AAG 8 )

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶20

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶21

2 08-11-2017 Office objections ignored.

¶22

Inter alia, contending that in spite of the order passed on 28.4.2017 in LPA No. 444 of 2014, the respondent-Collector has not decided the appeal in the matter of appointment of Aanganwari Sahaika to the center in question even after the period of 45 days granted by this Court has elapsed, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt.

¶23

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case

¶24

Patna High Court MJC No.2742 of 2017(2) dt.08-11-2017 2/2

¶25

and for the present without initiating any action for contempt, it is directed that in case the appeal is not decided till date, the respondent Collector shall decide it now positively within 30 days failing which this Court may consider taking coercive action against him.

¶26

With the aforesaid the application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶28

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶29

spandey/-

¶30

Sunita Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Kumari and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jai Mangal Mahton Vs State of Bihar

Ramashish Singh and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Dr. Pramod Kumar Verma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Nath Raut and Ors. Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Upendra Choudhary Vs Mukesh Choudhary and Ors.