Oral order disposing a contempt application allowing the petitioner to raise any remaining legitimate claim before the competent authority.
Liberty given to the petitioner to raise the issue before the competent authority who must consider and decide within a reasonable time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1939 of 2017
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar Sinha, son of Late Anup Lal Sinha, resident of Village+P.O.Ratan, P.S.- Gogri Jamalpur, District- Khagaria at present posted as Hawaldar No.692 in Police Line Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. D. YADAV - AAG 9 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
3 20-09-2017 Contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that if any legitimate claim remains he can raise the issue before the competent authority, who have an obligation to consider the same and decide within a reasonable time.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Pawan/-
U
Sudhir Kumar Sinha
The State of Bihar
R.K. Mahajan
Azad Hind Prasad
Lakhindra Prasad
Amir Subhani
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
