Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav v. Chinta Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
C.Misc. No.1579 of 2016 (2) dt.13-01-2017 IN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1579 of 2016 (2) dt.13-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1579 of 2016
====================================================== Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav .... .... Appellant/s Versus Chinta Devi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dr. Anshuman For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER
2 13-01-2017 The learned counsel, Mr. Anshuman, for the petitioner submitted that against the Judgment of the Session Judge in fact criminal revision and / or proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. will be maintainable in view of the decisions of (i) (2011)12 SCC 588 (ii) (2016)11 SCC774 (iii) (2016)2 SCC 705 (iv) (2014) SCC Online Mumbai 1372 (v)(2012) SCC Online Delhi 3192. Therefore, he seeks permission to convert this Civil Misc. application to a proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In view of his submission, his prayer is allowed. He is permitted to convert this Civil Misc. application to Cr. Misc. application under Section 482 within two weeks.
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J)
Sanjeev/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned counsel's submission to convert the civil application to a Cr. Misc. application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable.
Whether the conversion of the civil miscellaneous application to a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is permitted.
Ram Pravesh Singh Yadav
Chinta Devi
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court