Oral order dismissing a miscellaneous appeal for non-prosecution after appellants failed to appear on the date fixed for hearing despite previous adjournment requests.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.805 of 2012
======================================================
Munna Mahto & Anr.
.... .... Appellant/s Versus Om Prakash Mehta & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
20 11-09-2017 No one turned up on behalf of the appellants to advance their argument in the case.
On perusal of the record, it appears that on the last two occasions, the case was adjourned on the request of the appellant. Thus, it transpires that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
rohit/-
U
Munna Mahto & Anr.
Om Prakash Mehta & Ors.
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
